On Consumer Reports and Reliability Ratings
We’re car shopping. The reasons why shouldn’t concern you, but suffice it to say there’s one less SUV rolling down the road.
As we looked over the Consumer Reports reliability ratings for cars, it was interesting to hear how suspicious my wife was to a model’s sudden change from bad reliability to good reliability, but how easily she accepted a change from good reliability to bad reliability. Certainly, it was impossible to get better suddenly. But getting worse suddenly was easy.
I pointed out that in the cases where the car went from bad to good, the car had been significantly redesigned, which makes sense. Car manufacturers, after all, do not strive for unreliability (though some do seem to be trying, shall we say, a bit less than others). Where a car goes from great to crap in one model year, no major redesign was involved: quality simply declined in a horrible way.
And yet we had no trouble believing that it was easier, and perhaps more likely, for quality to go down than up. Is this human nature? Or is this just a misunderstanding of how
Search
Tag Cloud
- 10.10
- 10.9
- Air Travel
- Another Take
- Aperture
- Apple
- AppleScript
- AppleTV
- Aviation
- Bill
- Cancer
- China
- Christianity
- Christmas
- Conservative
- Cycling
- Dogs
- Dumb Design
- Economy
- Ego
- Election 2008
- Election 2010
- Election 2012
- Energy
- Engineering
- Four Word Movie Review
- Four Word Reviews
- Fun Stuff
- God
- Government
- Grammar
- H.
- Healthcare
- Humor
- Internet
- iOS
- iPad
- iPhone
- iTunes
- Liberal
- Mac App Store
- MacOS X
- MacOS X Server
- Mavericks
- Medicine
- Microsoft
- Mr. Bill Goes to Washington
- Music
- Nobama
- Note to Self
- O.
- Observations
- Opinion
- Parenting
- Partial Fractions
- PHP
- php
- Politics
- Programming
- Puzzles
- Random
- Random Thoughts
- Rant
- Review
- ROS1
- Safari
- Sermon Starter
- Signal
- spam filter
- Spamhaus.org
- T.
- Tech
- Tolland
- Tools
- Translation
- Travel
- Vacation
- W.
- Weight Loss
- WTF?
- Xserve
- Yosemite
Archives
- November 2024
- November 2022
- May 2022
- November 2021
- August 2021
- February 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- May 2017
- November 2016
- July 2016
- May 2016
- July 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- July 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- April 2004
Recent Comments